Archive for the ‘911 Truth’ Category

Who melted my car and the plane?

Posted: June 26, 2013 in 911 Truth

When you first saw this did something seem strange?, maybe even subconsciously?


Flight 175 seems to melt into building.

Well maybe your weren’t totally crazy and your subconcious was working just fine.

Start clicking below and jump in.

The Star Wars Beam Weapons and Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)
(A focus of the Star Wars Program)

Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Morgan Reynolds
(originally posted: October 17, 2006)meltedcar

Page 5: Toasted Cars

A reported 1400 vehicles were damaged on 9/11. [Reference] These vehicles had peculiar patterns of damage and some were as far away as FDR Drive (about 7 blocks from the WTC, along the East River). Vehicles had missing door handles for example, windows blown out, window frames deformed, melted engine blocks, steel-belted tires with only the steel belts left, and vehicle front ends destroyed with little or no effect on the back end of the vehicles. What could have caused such extraordinary damage? Portions of cars burned while paper nearby did not.

and it is debunked here:

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood

and all debunked here:

The Real Truth Behind The Greatest Illusion Of All Time-9/11 by Brian S Staveley

Everything we have learned about the thermite controlled demolition of the twin towers resulting in 3000 deaths is an outright lie and put out by the government to keep us from the REAL TRUTH. Yes the government put out the story about the thermite. You will see why. This doesn’t mean 9/11 truth is dead. It just means the focus needs to be totally changed. Everyone has it all wrong.

Why They Didn’t Use Planes To Hit The WTC

For those who ask:
“Why would the government fake crashing planes into the WTC towers and thereby also having to fake all the crash videos when it would be much easier for them to crash real planes into them?”

(Video: Hezarkhani)

Here is why they didn’t use real planes to crash into the WTC and used TV fakery instead:


Here is the latest theory I can find ,which also debunks all previous theories.

No-planes theory…

Click on these photos to blow them up…

flight-175-cgi-glitch flight-175-cgi-glitch-2

The “no plane theory,” promoted by internet-only videos like 911 Taboo,[168] asserts that this shot of the second impact, taken from a news helicopter, depicts a video composite of a Boeing 767 accidentally appearing from behind a Layer Mask.

Nico Haupt and former chief economist within the Labor Department under the Bush administration, Morgan Reynolds, argue that no planes were used in the attacks. Reynolds claims it is physically impossible that the Boeing planes of Flights 11 and 175 could have penetrated the steel frames of the Towers, and that digital compositing was used to depict the plane crashes in both news reports and subsequent amateur video.[169] “There were no planes, there were no hijackers,” Reynolds insists. “I know, I know, I’m out of the mainstream, but that’s the way it is.” According to David Shayler, “The only explanation is that they were missiles surrounded by holograms made to look like planes,” he says. “Watch footage frame by frame and you will see a cigar-shaped missile hitting the World Trade Center.” Truth movement veterans have repeatedly refuted the “no-plane” claims.[76][169][170] Discussion of no plane theories has been banned from certain conspiracy theory websites and advocates have sometimes been threatened with violence by posters at other conspiracy theory websites.[171]

It’s been around since late 2011: